Source: Judeosphere
Der Spiegel serves up this overview and critique of Obama’s Middle East diplomacy, noting that: "Obama’s failure in the Middle East is but one example of his weakness, though a particularly drastic and vivid one….When he began his term more than a year ago, he came across as an ambitious developer who had every intention of completing multiple projects at once. But after a year, none of those projects has even progressed beyond the early construction phase. And in some cases, the sites are nothing but deep excavations."
Ouch. The authors of the article argue that Obama’s lack of results is all the more tragic, since, for the first time in recent memory, Israelis and Arabs share a common concern:
"In the Middle East, the irresolute Obama is missing an opportunity to bring about peace that he—and probably a number of his successors—will not be offered in its current form anytime soon. Never before in Israeli history have Jews and Arabs been as united as they are today, in the face of the Iranian nuclear threat. Indeed, the Saudi Arabian foreign minister has spoken openly of the need for a military strike against Iran.- Le retournement anti-israélien d’Obama, un éditorial sévère et désabusé du ’Wall Street Journal’
Spiegel has learned that Western intelligence services believe that the Saudis would even provide the Israelis with access to their airspace for such a strike. This stands in contrast to the Americans, who—with good reason—are unwilling to allow them to fly over Iraq.
In the face of the pressure from Iran, Arab regimes are more willing to compromise than they have been in a long time. Before Biden’s visit, they unanimously called upon the Palestinians to enter into a new round of negotiations with Israel. Today, many Arab leaders support peace in the Middle East, their earlier positions on the issue notwithstanding.
The Arab states are no longer the ones who benefit from the Middle East conflict. Instead, it is the Iranian leadership, whose ruthless rhetoric and nuclear program has the Arabs just as nervous as the Israelis."
- Rompant avec ses habitudes de discrétion, l’AIPAC exprime sa vive préoccupation de la tension entre les Etats-Unis et Israël, Yitzhak Benhorin
1 commentaire :
Le premier objectif de l'Iran est de résister aux pressions internationales visant à le faire plier sur son programme nucléaire. L'Iran se voit comme la grande puissance régionale, voire comme l'un des grands pays parmi les plus influents sur la scène internationale. Cela explique par exemple l'activité diplomatique de Téhéran en Afrique et en Amérique latine. AuProche-Orient, l'Iran s'efforce d'apparaître comme le plus fervent défenseur de la cause palestinienne (soutien au Hamas et au Jihad islamique) afin de rallier la "rue arabe" à sa cause, fragilisant ainsi des régimes autocratiques arabes accusés de "compromissions" avec Israël. Cet objectif géopolitique semble d'ailleurs contraire aux intérêts nationaux de l'Iran puisque Téhéran n'a pas de contentieux bilatéral avec Israël, mais plutôt une confrontation idéologique. Volontarisme, optimisme et patriotisme... tel est triptyque défendu par Barack Obama. Bientôt, comme pas mal d'hommes politiques européens, il nous affirmera que l'Iran peut constituer une force stabilisatrice dans la région.
Enregistrer un commentaire