Chomsky disses BDS-- and he's STILL wrong about it @ Blue Truth
This week in The Nation, Noam Chomsky has joined Norman Finkelstein and MJ Rosenberg in distancing himself from the BDS movement. All three are well known as harsh critics of Israel, with added legitimacy and fame (or infamy, depending on your viewpoint) granted to them by virtue of being Jewish. Yet, starting with the posting on YouTube of Finkelstein's 2012 interview with a BDS activist that became a must-watch for those involved in this issue, they have each called out BDS quite publicly.
Finkelstein was entirely clear about what BDS was about; referring to it as a "cult", he noted the implications of their demands: "We want the end of the occupation, the right of return, and we want equal rights for Arabs in Israel. And they think they are very clever because they know the result of implementing all three is what, what is the result? You know and I know what the result is. There’s no Israel!"
Rosenberg, in a Huffington Post column a few months ago, gave his message away in the title of a column that, except for a few statements, I could have written myself: "The BDS Movement Is About Dismantling Israel, Not The '67 Occupation". He stated "The demands make clear that the movement's goal is ending Israeli statehood, not just the post-1967 occupation..... If the BDS goals were achieved, there would be no State of Israel at all. That is why so many proponents of BDS have such a hard time even referring to Israel as a country. It's often the "Zionist entity" or the "occupying regime." Rosenberg has also denounced one of the leaders of the BDS movement, Ali Abunimah, for open anti-Semitism-- and recognized that Jews on the left tolerate that far too easily: "There is a tendency among Jews on the left, including myself, to argue so vehemently that being anti-Israel does not make one an anti-Semite that we don’t notice when being anti-Israel coexists with anti-Semitism, that one just feeds the other. We should".Finkelstein was entirely clear about what BDS was about; referring to it as a "cult", he noted the implications of their demands: "We want the end of the occupation, the right of return, and we want equal rights for Arabs in Israel. And they think they are very clever because they know the result of implementing all three is what, what is the result? You know and I know what the result is. There’s no Israel!"
Now Chomsky has joined with his denunciation of BDS, but even in recognizing its errors, he continues to get the story wrong. [...]
It's good that even severe Jewish critics of Israel are waking up to the dogmatic anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism that is baked into the BDS movement. They may be a bit late, having failed to notice that these have been part of the DNA of the movement since its birth in the moral sewer of the 2001 Durban NGO conference, but at least they are now calling BDS and its hateful leaders out openly. It seems that Jewish Voice for Peace has now left itself out alone on the BDS island, as they still stubbornly refuse to see the anti-Semitic hate speech of those with whom they choose to stand.
4 commentaires :
En général, une conduite s'évalue à l'aune d'un bilan et dans le domaine qui nous occupe et préoccupe, je crains que le côté négatif — je ne parle que de Chomsky — soir largement plus lourd que le positif. Sa critique permanente voire irrationnelle, tous azimuts, d'Israël et des juifs, ne doit pas nous faire perdre de vue qu'il est devenu et reste une icône de l'extrême gauche internationale. Une référence.
A parier que lors d'une prochaine interview, ce débris, aura a coeur d'affirmer ses propos ont été déformés et que le boycott lui parait une bonne arme contre l'état sioniste. Au fond, n'étaient ces relents d'antisémitisme, il serait d'accord avec BDS.
je crois que l'auteur de l'article n'a pas bien compris les positions de Chomsky. Je renvoie à ce lien qui les explicite:
http://fr.timesofisrael.com/chomsky-fustige-les-tactiques-du-bds-sur-le-modele-de-lafrique-du-sud/
Amicalement,
Fabien Ghez
Je ne crois pas que Monsieur Chomsky et compères aient changé.
Un proverbe dit :"Chassez le naturel, il revient au galop". Un antisioniste ou un anti-israëlien sera toujours le même.
Une promotion professionnelle, une nomination à une haute fonction politique contraindra un anti-israëlien à se modérer, à objectiver ses propos et à se taire mais aussitôt cette fonction achevée, le naturel reprendra vite le dessus.
Deuxième proverbe : "L'exception confirme la règle". On ne change pas sauf exception : mes obligations professionnelles me contraignent moi aussi à rester neutre ou à me taire mais, dans ma vie privée, je suis la même qu'il y a quinze ans et je serai la même dans 15 ans, c'est-à-dire une pro-israëlienne.
Vous avez raison Anne Juliette. Les trois sont des has-beens. Ils sont devenus célèbres (médiatiquement cela s'entend) parce que Juifs et anti-israéliens. Il fut un temps où cela marchait parfaitement. Maintenant plus personne n'a besoin d'eux - donc ils changent de disque. Par ailleurs, leur grande cause n'intéresse plus grand monde. Vous avez mille fois raison.
Enregistrer un commentaire