A méditer:
dimanche 16 mars 2014
Israël est le seul pays au monde qui a depuis 3000 ans les mêmes nom, langue et religion
"Israël est le seul pays au monde qui porte le même nom depuis 3000 ans et dont les habitants parlent la même langue, pratiquent la même religion et vivent dans la même terre comme il y a 3000 ans."
Ce que les médias ne vous montrent pas:
samedi 15 mars 2014
L'antisémitisme et l'antisionisme en Europe ne devraient étonner personne (Alan Dershowitz)
En 1801, Charles-Joseph, Prince de Ligne, révolté par la façon dont les Juifs étaient traités en Europe, lançait cet appel: "Une colère de 1800 ans me paraît avoir duré longtemps assez". Hélas la situation n'a pas changé et Alan Dershowitz rappelle que cette haine dure maintenant depuis 2000 ans: "the sordid history of Western Europe’s treatment of the Jews". En effet une histoire vraiment sordide.
Alan Dershowitz @ NewsMax: Europe's Alarming Push to Isolate Israel (extraits). Note: Alan Dershowitz est Démocrate (donc de gauche) et soutient le Président Barak Obama. Dans l'article il met en cause le rôle de certains Juifs dans la propagation de la détestation d'Israël. Comme l'a récemment dit l'historien Simon Epstein, l'antisémitisme va se maintenir et continuer de prospérer en Europe. C'est dommage, car quelques personnes comme Dershowitz et Epstein pourraient changer les choses car rien, absolument rien, ne prédestine l'Europe à ne pas respecter les Juifs et Israël.
"Why are so many of the grandchildren of Nazis and Nazi collaborators who brought us the Holocaust once again declaring war on the Jews? Why have we seen such an increase in anti-Semitism and irrationally virulent anti-Zionism in western Europe?
To answer these questions, a myth must first be exposed. That myth is the one perpetrated by the French, the Dutch, the Norwegians, the Swiss, the Belgians, the Austrians, and many other western Europeans: namely that the Holocaust was solely the work of German Nazis aided perhaps by some Polish, Ukrainian, Latvian, Lithuanian, and Estonian collaborators. False.
The Holocaust was perpetrated by Europeans — by Nazi sympathizers and collaborators among the French, Dutch, Norwegians, Swiss, Belgians, Austrians and other Europeans, both Western and Eastern. If the French government had not deported to the death camps more Jews than their German occupiers asked for; if so many Dutch and Belgian citizens and government officials had not cooperated in the roundup of Jews; if so many Norwegians had not supported Quisling; if Swiss government officials and bankers had not exploited Jews; if Austria had not been more Nazi than the Nazis, the Holocaust would not have had so many Jewish victims.
In light of the widespread European complicity in the destruction of European Jewry, the pervasive anti-Semitism and irrationally hateful anti-Zionism that has recently surfaced throughout western Europe toward Israel should surprise no one.
"Why are so many of the grandchildren of Nazis and Nazi collaborators who brought us the Holocaust once again declaring war on the Jews? Why have we seen such an increase in anti-Semitism and irrationally virulent anti-Zionism in western Europe?
To answer these questions, a myth must first be exposed. That myth is the one perpetrated by the French, the Dutch, the Norwegians, the Swiss, the Belgians, the Austrians, and many other western Europeans: namely that the Holocaust was solely the work of German Nazis aided perhaps by some Polish, Ukrainian, Latvian, Lithuanian, and Estonian collaborators. False.
.jpg) |
| La Shoah fait aussi rire les arrière-petits-enfants: "C'est quelle marque le four? J'ai besoin d'un avec les même dimensions chez moi." |
In light of the widespread European complicity in the destruction of European Jewry, the pervasive anti-Semitism and irrationally hateful anti-Zionism that has recently surfaced throughout western Europe toward Israel should surprise no one.
vendredi 14 mars 2014
Edgar Morin a peur du Lobby malgré "ses grands airs", selon Pierre Piccinin
"Une vingtaine d'intellectuels belges et français, des grands noms attaqués par le Lobby et qui, ensemble, enfin, vont tout en dire. [...] Toute sa force [du Lobby] réside dans notre peur."
"Attaqué, une fois de plus, lâchement, par la mafia sioniste, je n'ai pas peur. Et un jour la peur changera de camp et ce sont eux qui en auront à rendre des comptes."
Pierre Piccinin, est un pourfendeur de la "mafia sioniste". Cet enseignant publia cette remarque à l'occasion de la tuerie de Toulouse: "Si 4 enfants juifs méritent une minute de silence, les enfants palestiniens méritent qu'on se taise à jamais... faites passer ce message qu'il arrive aux juifs". Ces propos et d'autres ne gênent ni ses employeurs ni ses collègues enseignants (Athénée Royal Jean Rostand de Philippeville, Ecole européenne, le ministère de l'Education), ni la RTBF dont elle salue le courage et la détermination qui "forcent le respect", ni la presse écrite. Le 7 mars M. Piccinin fait part sur Facebook de son indignation face au refus d'autres Israël-bashers belges francophones comme Pierre Galand et Michel Collon se soient "débinés" à la perspective de de participer à un ouvrage collectif et révolutionnaire qui va définitivement permettre à des victimes du 'Lobby' de le démasquer. Mais son reproche principal va à Edgar Morin. Malgré ses "grands airs" chez Taddéï [...] "le Morin" a peur de prendre des coups du 'Lobby' (7 mars):
"Ah ! Edgar Morin chez Taddéï! Je lui ai demandé de participer à un projet de livre qui rassemble maintenant une vingtaine d'intellectuels belges et français, des grands noms attaqués par le Lobby et qui, ensemble, enfin, vont tout en dire.
Lui, il m'a répondu: "Que des coups à prendre! Non, merci..."
Moi, je me suis dit: "Au-delà des grands airs, décevant, le Morin..."
(A sa décharge, il n'a pas été le seul: Galand, Collon et d'autres se sont aussi débinés...)"
"Attaqué, une fois de plus, lâchement, par la mafia sioniste, je n'ai pas peur. Et un jour la peur changera de camp et ce sont eux qui en auront à rendre des comptes."
"Ah ! Edgar Morin chez Taddéï! Je lui ai demandé de participer à un projet de livre qui rassemble maintenant une vingtaine d'intellectuels belges et français, des grands noms attaqués par le Lobby et qui, ensemble, enfin, vont tout en dire.
Lui, il m'a répondu: "Que des coups à prendre! Non, merci..."
Moi, je me suis dit: "Au-delà des grands airs, décevant, le Morin..."
(A sa décharge, il n'a pas été le seul: Galand, Collon et d'autres se sont aussi débinés...)"
jeudi 13 mars 2014
Photo sur Facebook: "Mon piège à juif est prêt"
Trouvé sur la page Facebook du groupe belge francophone destiné aux jeunes Procit. L'individu (Mehdi Boudjnane) qui a posté la photo reconnaît que "C'est rasiste mais drôle x)". Vous remarquerez les deux billets de banque dans le four pour l'appropriation desquels les Juifs feraient n'importe quoi, vraiment n'importe quoi - même pour quelques sous. On notera que 179 jeunes Belges francophones apprécient ce post et que les gestionnaires du groupe Procit (qui compte 44.000 membres) n'ont rien trouvé de choquant. Inutile de dire que seuls les Juifs font l'objet d'un tel type d'humour.
D'autres membres du groupe ont posté les images suivantes:
mercredi 12 mars 2014
206 start-ups de nanotechnologie créées en Israël en six ans
Encore des claques pour les boycotteurs...
David Cameron to announce multi-million pound trade deals during Israel visit
Israel is a nanotech nation: 206 nanotech start-ups have been founded in the past six years
En finir avec les injections d’insuline grâce à une biotechnologie ...: Beta-O2 Technologies a développé une technologie qui pourrait considérablement faciliter la vie des patients diabétiques.
Israël au Top. Evgueni Plushenko, le Tsar du patinage Mondial, opéré en Israël: Impensable il y a quelques années de cela: Une star mondiale du sport qui se fait opérer en Israël! Les meilleurs chrurgiens sont supposés être en Europe où Etats-Unis. Evgueni Plushenko a désigné Israël pour être opérer; la raison est assez simple : le niveau de la médecine a fait de prodigieux bonds en avant dans de nombreux domaines.
2013 boom year for Israeli high-tech: In the first half of the year, there was a 52% rise in demand for mobile and web developers, and salaries are up as well.
L'Israélien BrainStorm Cell à la Pointe de la Thérapie Cellulaire: Maladie de Charcot: amélioration significative grâce aux cellules souches . BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics vient de publier dans la revue scientifique américaine Muscle Nerve, une ...
US transfers $429m for Iron Dome The funds are for procurement of the short-range missile interceptor systems.
Record tourism in February: There were 244,000 visitor entries in February 2014, 5% more than in February 2013.
Israel is a nanotech nation: 206 nanotech start-ups have been founded in the past six years
En finir avec les injections d’insuline grâce à une biotechnologie ...: Beta-O2 Technologies a développé une technologie qui pourrait considérablement faciliter la vie des patients diabétiques.
Israël au Top. Evgueni Plushenko, le Tsar du patinage Mondial, opéré en Israël: Impensable il y a quelques années de cela: Une star mondiale du sport qui se fait opérer en Israël! Les meilleurs chrurgiens sont supposés être en Europe où Etats-Unis. Evgueni Plushenko a désigné Israël pour être opérer; la raison est assez simple : le niveau de la médecine a fait de prodigieux bonds en avant dans de nombreux domaines.
2013 boom year for Israeli high-tech: In the first half of the year, there was a 52% rise in demand for mobile and web developers, and salaries are up as well.
L'Israélien BrainStorm Cell à la Pointe de la Thérapie Cellulaire: Maladie de Charcot: amélioration significative grâce aux cellules souches . BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics vient de publier dans la revue scientifique américaine Muscle Nerve, une ...
US transfers $429m for Iron Dome The funds are for procurement of the short-range missile interceptor systems.
Record tourism in February: There were 244,000 visitor entries in February 2014, 5% more than in February 2013.
mardi 11 mars 2014
David Cameron va-t-il reconnaître qu'Israël est un Etat juif?
"If Mr Cameron were to say that he recognises Israel as the natural home of the Jewish people, it would give him some capital in the peace process."
C'est ce que recommande Benedict Brogan du Daily Telegraph:
The Prime Minister travels to Israel early tomorrow, and will spend the day there, before going on to the Palestinian Authority. It's his first visit as Prime Minister, which is itself interesting. Quite why it has taken him four years to get round to it is the subject of mild curiosity both here and in Tel Aviv. He was supposed to go last month but the trip was postponed because of the floods. It's fairest to say that, relative to some of his predecessors, the Middle East peace process has not grabbed him as an issue. Britain is an important player in the region, as part of the wider European Union engagement, and William Hague has made it one of his major policy priorities. But Mr Cameron has so far not used his time in office to establish his bona fides as an interlocutor worth listening to. [...]
But it will be his address to the Knesset, and therefore the Israeli people, that will be watched intently for an idea of where Mr Cameron stands on the big existential issues at stake here. He's left it late, but not too late. One issue he may chose to address is the question of Israel's nature as a state. Mr Netanyahu wants the Palestinians, and the rest of us to recognise Israel as a specifically Jewish state – not a theocracy but as the home of the Jewish people. Angela Merkel has said she does, as have the Americans and the Canadians. Mr Cameron's speech will be followed closely for a similar statement. This would go further than the Foreign Office position that a state is defined first and foremost by its borders. If Mr Cameron were to say that he recognises Israel as the natural home of the Jewish people, it would give him some capital in the peace process.
C'est ce que recommande Benedict Brogan du Daily Telegraph:
The Prime Minister travels to Israel early tomorrow, and will spend the day there, before going on to the Palestinian Authority. It's his first visit as Prime Minister, which is itself interesting. Quite why it has taken him four years to get round to it is the subject of mild curiosity both here and in Tel Aviv. He was supposed to go last month but the trip was postponed because of the floods. It's fairest to say that, relative to some of his predecessors, the Middle East peace process has not grabbed him as an issue. Britain is an important player in the region, as part of the wider European Union engagement, and William Hague has made it one of his major policy priorities. But Mr Cameron has so far not used his time in office to establish his bona fides as an interlocutor worth listening to. [...]
But it will be his address to the Knesset, and therefore the Israeli people, that will be watched intently for an idea of where Mr Cameron stands on the big existential issues at stake here. He's left it late, but not too late. One issue he may chose to address is the question of Israel's nature as a state. Mr Netanyahu wants the Palestinians, and the rest of us to recognise Israel as a specifically Jewish state – not a theocracy but as the home of the Jewish people. Angela Merkel has said she does, as have the Americans and the Canadians. Mr Cameron's speech will be followed closely for a similar statement. This would go further than the Foreign Office position that a state is defined first and foremost by its borders. If Mr Cameron were to say that he recognises Israel as the natural home of the Jewish people, it would give him some capital in the peace process.
lundi 10 mars 2014
"All the strategies adopted against antisemitism failed"
En ce qui concerne l'échec inévitable de la lutte contre l'antisémitisme contemporain voir l'interview de l'historien Simon Epstein @ JForum.
Extraits de la recension de l'ouvrage collectif Rebels Against Zion: Studies on the Jewish Left Anti-Zionism, édité par August Grabski de l'Institut Historique Juif de Varsovie, par David Hirsh [photo], professeur de sociologie à l'Institut Goldsmiths, Université de Londres. @ Fathom et Engage:
In the first half of the 20th century, most Jews failed to find their way to a successful strategy for dealing with the threat antisemitism. [...] The truth [...] is that all the strategies adopted against antisemitism failed. Bundism was eradicated in the Nazi gas chambers. Bolshevism failed to stop the Shoah and, while it did succeed in gaining state power over a third of the world, it did not do so by defeating antisemitism but by adopting it in its anti-Zionist variant. Zionism too, as was broadly predicted by both Bundists and socialists, failed to save European Jews in the necessary numbers, and remained, until the 1940s, a utopian movement. [...]
In 1954 Isaac Deutscher, Trotsky’s biographer, wrote that he had ‘of course’ abandoned his life-long anti-Zionism. It seemed obvious to him that the world had changed, in Auschwitz and on the battlefield. European Jews had been murdered; the remnants had forged a new nation in Palestine, which Deutscher regarded as a ‘historic necessity’, a ‘raft state.’ Now the key questions changed. It was no longer relevant to ask whether Zionism was a winning strategy against antisemitism; the question was how would the Jewish state reach a peace with its neighbours and how it would negotiate the contradiction between its Jewishness and its democracy?
In the first half of the 20th century, most Jews failed to find their way to a successful strategy for dealing with the threat antisemitism. [...] The truth [...] is that all the strategies adopted against antisemitism failed. Bundism was eradicated in the Nazi gas chambers. Bolshevism failed to stop the Shoah and, while it did succeed in gaining state power over a third of the world, it did not do so by defeating antisemitism but by adopting it in its anti-Zionist variant. Zionism too, as was broadly predicted by both Bundists and socialists, failed to save European Jews in the necessary numbers, and remained, until the 1940s, a utopian movement. [...]
In 1954 Isaac Deutscher, Trotsky’s biographer, wrote that he had ‘of course’ abandoned his life-long anti-Zionism. It seemed obvious to him that the world had changed, in Auschwitz and on the battlefield. European Jews had been murdered; the remnants had forged a new nation in Palestine, which Deutscher regarded as a ‘historic necessity’, a ‘raft state.’ Now the key questions changed. It was no longer relevant to ask whether Zionism was a winning strategy against antisemitism; the question was how would the Jewish state reach a peace with its neighbours and how it would negotiate the contradiction between its Jewishness and its democracy?
Inscription à :
Articles
(
Atom
)